II UZ 68/04
AI generated
Supreme Court allows appeal against social insurance rejection when lawyer represents a sole proprietor, exempting the declaration requirement.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court overturned the appellate court's dismissal of a social insurance appeal filed by a sole proprietor. The appellant's lawyer argued that the mandatory declaration under Article 89 § 3 of the Civil Procedure Code did not apply to legal counsel representing a sole proprietor. The court ruled that since the lawyer represents a business entity rather than an individual in a personal capacity, the specific declaration requirement is unnecessary, thereby validating the appeal.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 89 § 3 k.p.c.; Art. 4 ust. 1 ustawy o radcach prawnych; When a lawyer represents a sole proprietor, the declaration required by Art. 89 § 3 of the Civil Procedure Code is not applicable.
Keywords
AI generated
sole proprietor representation
legal counsel declaration
social insurance appeal
Civil Procedure Code
business entity status
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 89 § 3 k.p.c.
Art. 4 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 6 lipca 1982 r. o radcach prawnych
Art. 2 ust. 2 ustawy z dnia 19 listopada 1999 r. - Prawo działalności gospodarczej
Art. 4 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 2 lipca 2004 r. o swobodzie działalności gospodarczej
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 397 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 393 § 1 i § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 98 k.p.c.
§ 11 ust. 2 rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 28 września 2002 r.
art. 89 § 3 k.p.c