Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I UK 166/04 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses worker's claim against employer due to lack of standing, not procedural transfer issues.

Case Number I UK 166/04
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by a worker against his employer regarding workplace injury compensation. The lower courts correctly identified that the employer lacked standing because the Social Insurance Fund, not the employer, is the liable party under the relevant Act. The Court distinguished this case from a prior precedent where the employer was a socialized entity, confirming that civil courts retain jurisdiction over such disputes regardless of the employer's status.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 32 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 12 czerwca 1975 r. o świadczeniach z tytułu wypadków przy pracy i chorób zawodowych; Art. 1, 2 k.p.c.: A civil court retains jurisdiction over workplace injury claims against an employer, and the employer lacks standing if the Social Insurance Fund is the designated liable party.

Keywords

AI generated
workplace injury compensation lack of standing Social Insurance Fund civil jurisdiction employer liability cassation appeal procedural transfer

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 32 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 12 czerwca 1975 r. o świadczeniach z tytułu wypadków przy pracy i chorób zawodowych
Art. 1 k.p.c.
Art. 2 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 2 § 3 k.p.c.
Art. 464 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 393 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 464 § 1 k.p.c
art. 379 pkt 1 k.p.c
art. 2 § 3 k.p.c
art. 199 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated
II UK 353/03
II UK 353/02

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text