III SPP 11/05
AI generated
Court dismissed appeal for delay costs due to subjective refusal to work, not objective inability.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the applicant's request for a waiver of filing fees and appointment of counsel for a delay appeal. The applicant claimed inability to work but admitted to taking only employment within a specific housing cooperative, contradicting his general statement of willingness to work. The court ruled that this selective employment intent constituted a subjective refusal rather than an objective impediment, thereby denying fee relief.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 117 § 2 k.p.c.; Art. 113 § 1 k.p.c.: A claimant's subjective refusal to engage in any profitable activity, evidenced by selective employment intent, precludes a waiver of court fees and appointment of counsel for delay appeals.
Keywords
AI generated
subjective refusal to work
waiver of court fees
appointment of counsel
delay appeal procedure
civil litigation costs
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 117 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 113 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 3932 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 8 ust. 2 ustawy z dnia 17 czerwca 2004 r. o skardze na naruszenie prawa strony do rozpoznania sprawy w postępowaniu sądowym bez nieuzasadnionej zwłoki
Art. 39318 § 3 k.p.c.
7 uchwała składu siedmiu sędziów Sądu Najwyższy z dnia 16 listopada 2004 r. - III SPP 42/04
art. 61 § 6 in fine ustawy z dnia 23 listopada 2002 r. o Sądzie Najwyższym
art. 113 § 1 k.p.c
art. 3932 § 1 k.p.c
art. 39318 § 3 k.p.c