Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II PK 193/04 AI generated

Non-compete clause in employment contract without compensation is invalid under Polish Labor Code.

Case Number II PK 193/04
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's cassation appeal against a lower court ruling that rejected his claim for damages based on a non-compete agreement. The court found that the clause in the employment contract merely prohibited the disclosure of trade secrets, aligning with the Anti-Unfair Competition Act, rather than constituting a valid non-compete agreement under the Labor Code. Consequently, the plaintiff was not bound by a non-compete restriction and could not claim damages for alleged breach of such a non-existent agreement.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 11 ust. 4 ustawy o zwalczaniu nieuczciwej konkurencji; Art. 1012 k.p.: A clause in an employment contract prohibiting the disclosure of trade secrets does not constitute a valid non-compete agreement if it lacks a prohibition on competing activities and does not include compensation for the employee.

Keywords

AI generated
non-compete agreement trade secrets Labor Code employment contract damages claim Anti-Unfair Competition Act cassation appeal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 11 ust. 4 ustawy z dnia 16 kwietnia 1993 r. o zwalczaniu nieuczciwej konkurencji
Art. 1012 k.p.
Art. 1011 k.p.
Art. 385 k.p.c.
Art. 393 k.p.c.
art. 1012 k.p
art. 1012 § 3 k.p
art. 18 § 2 k.p
art. 58 k.c
art. 1012 § 1 k.p

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text