Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II PK 186/04 AI generated

Employer must pay non-compete damages monthly if contract terms are silent on payment schedule.

Case Number II PK 186/04
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal against a lower court judgment regarding non-compete damages. The employer argued the non-compete agreement was void due to a lack of essential information, while the court found the employee had access to necessary company data. The court ruled that the employer's obligation to pay damages updates according to the contract's payment terms or, if unspecified, monthly installments aligned with salary payments.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 1012 § 3 k.p.; art. 481 § 1 k.c.; art. 300 k.p.: The employer's obligation to pay damages for non-compete behavior updates according to terms agreed in the contract, or if no terms are set, in monthly installments consistent with salary payment periods.

Keywords

AI generated
non-compete agreement damages payment terms monthly installments labor law salary payment periods

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 1012 § 3 k.p.
art. 481 § 1 k.c.
art. 300 k.p.
art. 1012 § 3 k.p
art. 488 § 1 k.c
art. 1012 § 1 k.p
art. 300 k.p
art. 481 § 1 k.c

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text