II PK 164/04
AI generated
Special protection for trade union members requires union committee designation, not general union resolution.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by an employee seeking reinstatement after her employer terminated her contract. The lower courts found that the employer's decision to dismiss the plaintiff was lawful because she was not properly designated as a person requiring special protection under the Trade Union Act. The court held that only a specific union committee resolution can grant such protection, whereas a general union executive board resolution is legally insufficient to trigger the statutory safeguard.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 32 ust. 1 pkt 1 ustawy o związkach zawodowych; Special protection for trade union members applies only when designated by a union committee resolution, not by a general union executive board decision.
Keywords
AI generated
special protection trade union
reinstatement employment contract
union committee resolution
employer dismissal law
cassation appeal dismissal
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 32 ust. 1 pkt 1 ustawy o związkach zawodowych
Art. 233 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 38 k.p
art. 30 § 4 k.p
art. 32 Konstytucji RP
art. 233 § 1 k.p.c
art. 32 Konstytucji
art. 233 k.p.c
Cited Case Law
AI generatedIV CKN 1316/00
IV CKN 1256/00
IV CKN 1050/00