Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II PK 164/04 AI generated

Special protection for trade union members requires union committee designation, not general union resolution.

Case Number II PK 164/04
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by an employee seeking reinstatement after her employer terminated her contract. The lower courts found that the employer's decision to dismiss the plaintiff was lawful because she was not properly designated as a person requiring special protection under the Trade Union Act. The court held that only a specific union committee resolution can grant such protection, whereas a general union executive board resolution is legally insufficient to trigger the statutory safeguard.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 32 ust. 1 pkt 1 ustawy o związkach zawodowych; Special protection for trade union members applies only when designated by a union committee resolution, not by a general union executive board decision.

Keywords

AI generated
special protection trade union reinstatement employment contract union committee resolution employer dismissal law cassation appeal dismissal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 32 ust. 1 pkt 1 ustawy o związkach zawodowych
Art. 233 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 38 k.p
art. 30 § 4 k.p
art. 32 Konstytucji RP
art. 233 § 1 k.p.c
art. 32 Konstytucji
art. 233 k.p.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated
IV CKN 1316/00
IV CKN 1256/00
IV CKN 1050/00

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text