I UK 159/04
AI generated
Social security agency's illegal decision causing delay obligates agency to pay interest despite constitutional law issues.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court reversed the lower court's dismissal of the pensioner's claim, ordering the agency to pay interest from December 1999. The agency had refused benefits despite the applicant meeting all statutory requirements, meaning the delay was their fault. Consequently, the court held the agency liable for interest even though the underlying pension law was later declared unconstitutional.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 85 ust. 1 zd. 2 ustawy o systemie ubezpieczeń społecznych; Art. 393 § 15 k.p.c.: When a social security agency issues an illegal decision denying benefits while the applicant has fulfilled all conditions, the resulting delay is attributable to the agency, mandating interest payment regardless of the agency's lack of negligence.
Keywords
AI generated
social security benefits
illegal administrative decision
statutory interest obligation
constitutional unconstitutionality
agency liability
pension arrears
procedural admissibility
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 85 ust. 1 zdanie drugie ustawy z dnia 13 października 1998 r. o systemie ubezpieczeń społecznych
Art. 393 § 15 k.p.c.
Art. 3937 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 100 k.p.c.
Art. 104 ust. 7 ustawy z dnia 17 grudnia 1998 r. o emeryturach i rentach z Funduszu Ubezpieczeń Społecznych
Art. 40 ustawy z dnia 10 grudnia 1993 r. o zaopatrzeniu emerytalnym żołnierzy zawodowych oraz ich rodzin
art. 190 ust. 2 Konstytucji RP
art. 2 Konstytucji
art. 32 Konstytucji
art. 39315 k.p.c
Cited Case Law
AI generatedII UK 214/02
Social security agency liable for interest only after final court ruling establishes disability rights.
II UK 485/03
Social insurance fund not liable for late payments unless independent causes or fault caused delay.
I PKN 325/99
Cassation dismissed because appeal court awarded damages without ruling on reinstatement claim, making cassation inadmissible.
K 4/99
Constitutional Court clarifies that pension reform for uniformed personnel violates trust in law, not the act itself.
II UK 394/01
II UK 394/02