Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
II PK 142/04 AI generated

Supreme Court dismissed appeal; failure to issue shares within two years did not create compensation claims.

Case Number II PK 142/04
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by employees against the State Treasury and a privatization agency. The lower court had partially granted claims for damages and undivided profits regarding the delayed issuance of shares in a privatized state enterprise. The Supreme Court ruled that the statutory two-year deadline for issuing shares was merely a competence norm, and its non-compliance did not constitute a legal defect justifying compensation.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 19 ust. 1 ustawy o prywatyzacji przedsiębiorstw państwowych; The failure of the State Treasury to issue shares to employees within the prescribed two-year period does not generate compensation claims, as the norm is purely competence-based and subsequent issuance validates the delay.

Keywords

AI generated
privatization competence norm state enterprise shares delayed share issuance compensation claims dismissal privatization statute interpretation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 19 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 13 lipca 1990 r. o prywatyzacji przedsiębiorstw państwowych
Art. 415 i nast. k.c.
Art. 471 k.c.
Art. 393 § 2 k.p.c.
art. 471 k.c
art. 417 k.c
art. 382 k.p.c
art. 3921 k.p.c
art. 39312 § 2 k.p.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated
III CZP 49/00
Supreme Court allows denial of cassation review for judgments issued before the new Civil Procedure Code took effect.
II PK 85/04

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text