Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III SPP 126/04 AI generated

Appeal court dismissed delay complaint because defense request was vague and predated initial trial judgment.

Case Number III SPP 126/04
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed Andrzej K.'s complaint regarding procedural delay in his criminal appeal proceedings. The applicant alleged that courts failed to consider a defense request but provided no specific details about what that request entailed. The court ruled that such vague allegations do not justify a delay claim, especially since the unspecified request was submitted before the first trial judgment.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Ustawa z dnia 17 czerwca 2004 r. o skardze na naruszenie prawa strony do rozpoznania sprawy w postępowaniu sądowym bez nieuzasadnionej zwłoki, art. 9 ust. 1; A complaint for procedural delay must cite specific circumstances justifying the claim, and vague references to unconsidered requests submitted prior to the initial judgment are insufficient grounds for such a complaint.

Keywords

AI generated
procedural delay complaint vague defense request preliminary trial submission Supreme Court dismissal criminal appeal proceedings

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 9 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 17 czerwca 2004 r. o skardze na naruszenie prawa strony do rozpoznania sprawy w postępowaniu sądowym bez nieuzasadnionej zwłoki
art. 148 § 1 k.k
art. 286 k.k

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text