III SPP 124/04
AI generated
Supreme Court dismissed appeal on delay, ruling three-month review of temporary arrest extension was timely.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed Andrzej K.'s appeal alleging procedural delay in reviewing a temporary arrest extension. The court found the three-month review period was reasonable given the need to prepare for a hearing involving extensive evidence and notify parties in advance. Consequently, the court held that no unjustified delay occurred, as the review was conducted promptly within the statutory timeframe.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 12 ust. 1 ustawy o skardze na naruszenie prawa strony do rozpoznania sprawy w postępowaniu sądowym bez nieuzasadnionej zwłoki; The court must assess whether a delay was unjustified by considering the complexity of the case and the time required for proper preparation and notification of parties.
Keywords
AI generated
procedural delay
temporary arrest extension
appeal dismissal
unjustified delay
Supreme Court review
criminal procedure
statutory timeframe
Cited Legislation
AI generatedart. 12 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 17 czerwca 2004 r. o skardze na naruszenie prawa strony do rozpoznania sprawy w postępowaniu sądowym bez nieuzasadnionej zwłoki
art. 148 § 1 k.k
art. 286 k.k
art. 203 § 1 k.k