II PK 107/04 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal because group and individual layoffs cannot be applied simultaneously under the same grounds.

Case Number II PK 107/04

Court / Authority Sąd Najwyższy

Jurisdiction

Poland (PL)

Decision Date 2004-12-14

Outcome Dismissed

Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court quashed the lower court's decision allowing simultaneous group and individual layoffs based on restructuring grounds. The plaintiff argued for individual dismissal, but the court found the lower court incorrectly applied the law by permitting both collective and individual termination methods under identical circumstances. Consequently, the case was remanded for a new trial to ensure compliance with the prohibition against concurrent dismissal procedures.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 1 ust. 1; Art. 10 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 28 grudnia 1989 r. o szczególnych zasadach rozwiązywania z pracownikami stosunków pracy z przyczyn dotyczących zakładu pracy: Simultaneous application of collective and individual dismissal procedures based on the same grounds is prohibited.

Keywords

AI generated

collective dismissal individual dismissal restructuring grounds simultaneous termination labor law remand for retrial prohibition of concurrency

Cited Legislation

AI generated

Art. 1 ust. 1 of the Act of December 28, 1989 on special rules for resolving employment relationships with employees due to reasons related to the workplace

Art. 10 ust. 1 of the Act of December 28, 1989 on special rules for resolving employment relationships with employees due to reasons related to the workplace

Art. 3931 § 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure

art. 45 § 1 k.p

art. 45 k.p

art. 385 k.p.c

art. 30 § 4 k.p

art. 227 k.p.c

art. 3931 k.p.c

art. 3931 pkt 1 k.p.c

Supreme Court dismisses appeal because group and individual layoffs cannot be applied simultaneously under the same grounds.

Legislator summary

Legislator headnote

Keywords

Cited Legislation

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Full text