Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I UK 56/04 AI generated

Supreme Court dismissed cassation, ruling the 5-year insurance requirement for post-30 disability pensions is not unequal treatment.

Case Number I UK 56/04
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by Zdzisław T. against a Social Insurance Office decision denying him a disability pension. The applicant argued that the statutory requirement for five years of insurance within the last ten years before disability constituted unequal treatment under the Constitution. The court rejected this claim, explaining that the specific insurance period requirement is a necessary condition for the right to benefits, ensuring that only those currently covered by the insurance fund receive payments.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 58 ust. 2 ustawy o emeryturach i rentach z Funduszu Ubezpieczeń Społecznych; The requirement for a five-year insurance period within the last ten years for disability pensions acquired after age 30 does not constitute unequal treatment but reflects the causal link between the right to benefits and the period of insurance coverage.

Keywords

AI generated
disability pension insurance period requirement unequal treatment Social Insurance Office cassation appeal Fundusz Ubezpieczeń Społecznych age 30 threshold

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 58 ust. 2 ustawy z dnia 17 grudnia 1998 r. o emeryturach i rentach z Funduszu Ubezpieczeń Społecznych
Art. 393 § 12 k.p.c.
art. 210 § 1 k.p.c
art. 379 pkt 5 k.p.c
art. 328 § 2 k.p.c
art. 391 k.p.c
art. 385 k.p.c
art. 3931 k.p.c
art. 3931 pkt 2 k.p.c
art. 3931 pkt 1 k.p.c

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text