I PK 463/03 AI generated

Supreme Court dismissed cassation against civil court ruling on unpaid project remuneration. Dismissed

Case Number I PK 463/03

Court / Authority Sąd Najwyższy

Jurisdiction

Poland (PL)

Decision Date 2004-11-04

Outcome Dismissed

Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by Mieczysław T. against the Regional Court's judgment awarding him partial payment for a rationalization project. The appellant argued that the project caused tax system damage, while the court found the delay in payment did not constitute an unlawful act. The court ruled that the lower court correctly applied procedural laws regarding evidence and legal assessment, rejecting the claim that omitted evidence could alter the case outcome.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 k.p.c.; Art. 381 k.p.c.; Art. 393 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 382 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 6 k.p.c.: A cassation appeal is inadmissible if it fails to demonstrate a violation of procedural laws governing evidence or if the lower court's legal assessment remains consistent with substantive law and prior precedents.

Keywords

AI generated

cassation appeal dismissal project remuneration dispute procedural evidence rules legal assessment consistency unlawful act requirement tax system damage claim civil procedure code

Cited Legislation

AI generated

Art. 385 k.p.c.

Art. 381 k.p.c.

Art. 393 § 1 k.p.c.

Art. 382 k.p.c.

Art. 386 § 6 k.p.c.

art. 415 k.c

art. 232 k.p.c

art. 233 § 1 k.p.c

art. 386 § 5 k.p.c

art. 158 § 1 k.p.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated

I CKN 595/97, OSNC 1998 nr 12, poz. 211

Supreme Court dismissed cassation against civil court ruling on unpaid project remuneration. Dismissed

Legislator summary

Legislator headnote

Keywords

Cited Legislation

Cited Case Law

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Full text