Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II UK 66/04 AI generated

Supreme Court quashes social security dismissal due to failure to notify excluded employee, allowing retrial.

Case Number II UK 66/04
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court quashed the lower court's dismissal of the insured's appeal regarding his social security status and benefits. The insured had been excluded from employment-based social insurance after a final ruling declared his employment contract with the employer fictitious. The Supreme Court found the lower courts violated procedural rules by failing to notify the insured, who was a party to the dispute, of the proceedings, thereby depriving him of the right to defend his rights.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 47711 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 379 pkt 5 k.p.c.; Art. 366 k.p.c.; Art. 365 k.p.c.; Art. 244 k.p.c.; Art. 39311 § 1 in fine k.p.c. - When an employee is excluded from social insurance, the exclusion decision and subsequent proceedings regarding benefits must be notified to the employee as a party; failure to do so violates the right to defense and renders the proceedings void.

Keywords

AI generated
social security exclusion employee notification duty right to defense void proceedings res judicata scope fictitious employment contract benefits recovery

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 47711 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 195 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 195 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 196 k.p.c.
Art. 401 pkt 2 k.p.c.
Art. 379 pkt 5 k.p.c.
Art. 366 k.p.c.
Art. 365 k.p.c.
Art. 244 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 39311 § 1 in fine k.p.c.
Art. 39312 k.p.c.
Art. 39319 k.p.c.

Cited Case Law

AI generated
IV CKN 1073/00

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text