Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I PK 627/03 AI generated

Supreme Court allows appeal dismissing strike suspension agreement as it does not override mandatory pre-retirement protection.

Case Number I PK 627/03
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the employer's cassation appeal regarding a strike suspension agreement that reduced wages for a pre-retirement employee. The court found that while the suspension agreement legally suspended collective bargaining rules, it could not bypass the mandatory protections of Article 39 of the Labor Code applicable to employees nearing retirement. Consequently, the court ruled that the employer did not violate the employee's specific rights because the suspension did not explicitly cover this protected category.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24127 k.p.; Art. 39 k.p. in conjunction with Art. 42 § 1 k.p.: A suspension agreement under Art. 24127 k.p. does not exempt pre-retirement employees from the mandatory protection against worsening working conditions provided by Art. 39 k.p.

Keywords

AI generated
strike suspension agreement pre-retirement protection Labor Code provisions wage reduction mandatory legal standards

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24127 k.p.
Art. 39 k.p.
Art. 42 § 1 k.p.
Art. 43 k.p.
Art. 393 § 12 k.p.c.
Art. 102 k.p.c.
Art. 393 § 19 k.p.c.
art. 24127 k.p
art. 42 § 1 k.p
art. 39 k.p

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text