Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III PZP 2/04 AI generated

Supreme Court ruled it has jurisdiction to hear appeals by judges transferred to lower administrative courts.

Case Number III PZP 2/04
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Poland ruled that it is the competent body to hear an appeal by a judge of the Chief Administrative Court transferred to a regional administrative court. Although the Chief Administrative Court's president requested dismissal, the judge withdrew her appeal, prompting the court to address the underlying legal question regarding jurisdiction. The court decided that the Supreme Court is the proper forum because the relevant administrative law provisions do not explicitly cover such transfers, necessitating an appropriate application of judicial review rules.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 94 § 1 ust. 1 k.p.s.; Art. 49 ust. 1 k.p.s.: When a specific statute does not regulate a particular judicial transfer, the court must apply the general judicial review provisions by analogy, designating the Supreme Court as the competent authority for such appeals.

Keywords

AI generated
judicial jurisdiction administrative court transfer analogy in law Supreme Court competence judicial review procedure

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 94 § 1 ust. 1 k.p.s.
Art. 49 ust. 1 k.p.s.
Art. 8 § 1 ustawy o Sądzie Najwyższym
Art. 75 ust. 4 k.p.s.
Art. 45 Konstytucji
Art. 6 ust. 1 Konwencji o Ochronie Praw Człowieka i Podstawowych Wolności
art. 236 ust. 2 Konstytucji RP
art. 10 ust. 2 Konstytucji
art. 184 Konstytucji
art. 180 ust. 5 Konstytucji

Cited Case Law

AI generated
K 28/99 (OTK 2000 nr 5, poz. 150)

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text