II UK 452/03
AI generated
Civil claim dismissed as statute of limitations expired; employer's conduct not inherently unlawful. Claim barred by 10-year limit from employment end date.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's cassation appeal regarding a compensation claim for occupational lung disease. The plaintiff argued the claim was not time-barred, but the Court held the limitation period expired ten years after the employment relationship ended in 1965. The Court determined that the employer's conduct, while causing harm, did not constitute a criminal offense requiring the extended ten-year limitation period from the crime's commission date.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 442 k.c.; Art. 6 k.k.; A civil claim for damages arising from an act prohibited by law is subject to a three-year limitation period from discovery, unless the act constitutes a crime, in which case the period is ten years from the act's commission, not the consequence.
Keywords
AI generated
statute of limitations
occupational disease
civil compensation
criminal act definition
limitation period calculation
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 442 k.c.
Art. 6 k.k.
Art. 101 § 3 k.k.
Art. 393 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 393 § 2 k.p.c.
art. 442 k.c
art. 5 k.c
art. 442 § 2 k.c
art. 442 § 1 k.c
art. 115 § 1 k.k
Cited Case Law
AI generatedII PZP 3/96
Civil Code Art. 442 § 1: Statute of limitations for occupational disease compensation begins at job cessation, not discovery.
II PZP 1/96
II UKN 387/97
II UKN 292/98
II UKN 237/99
II UKN 635/99
Supreme Court dismissed cassation; Civil Code applies to occupational disease claims barred by Workers' Protection Act.
III CZP 43/68
III CZP 118/92