Supreme Court dismissed appeal; employee must obey work-related orders without notice if job type remains unchanged.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the employee's cassation appeal against a dismissal for refusing to perform assigned duties. The lower courts found that the new tasks were identical in nature to the employee's original contract, making the assignment a valid work order under labor law. Consequently, the court ruled that the employer was not required to issue a notice of changing working conditions or apply specific temporary assignment rules, and the employee was legally obligated to comply.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 42 § 1 k.p.; Art. 42 § 4 k.p.; Art. 100 § 1 k.p.; Art. 45 § 1 k.p.; Art. 393 § 1 k.p.c.: When an employer assigns tasks of the same nature as those defined in the employment contract, the employee must comply with the order without the employer being obliged to issue a notice of changing working conditions or apply the rules for temporary assignment of different work.