Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III SK 56/04 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses Energy Office's power to modify existing contracts under Energy Law, directing case to Competition Office.

Case Number III SK 56/04
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal against the Energy Office's order to modify an existing energy supply contract. The court found that the Energy Office lacks jurisdiction over contracts already concluded and that such disputes fall under the Competition and Consumer Protection Law instead. Consequently, the case was remanded to the District Court for a new trial based on the correct legal framework.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 8 ust. 1 Prawa energetycznego; Art. 8 ust. 2 pkt 6 ustawy o ochronie konkurencji i konsumentów: The Energy Office cannot order changes to existing contracts; disputes regarding monopolistic practices in concluded agreements must be handled by the Competition Office under antimonopoly law.

Keywords

AI generated
Energy Office jurisdiction existing contracts modification monopolistic practices Competition Office authority remand to lower court energy supply agreements administrative vs civil law

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 8 ust. 1 of the Energy Law
Art. 8 ust. 2 pkt 6 of the Act on Protection of Competition and Consumers
Art. 393 § 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure
Art. 108 § 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure
Art. 58 of the Civil Code
art. 58 k.c
art. 328 § 2 k.p.c
art. 233 § 1 k.p.c
art. 3931 k.p.c
art. 39313 § 1 k.p.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text