Polish Supreme Court rules consent for a successor to enter labor law proceedings must be explicit, not implied.

The Supreme Court of Poland resolved a legal question regarding whether consent for a creditor's successor to enter labor law proceedings can be implied. The court held that under Article 192(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, such consent must be clearly declared rather than inferred from conduct. Consequently, the appellate court was required to ensure an explicit statement of agreement before allowing the successor to replace the original party in the dispute.