Supreme Court dismisses appeal; unwritten compensation regulation invalid; dismissal without prior regulation change ineffective.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by an investment firm against two employees seeking commission payments. The court held that an unwritten compensation regulation, not formally communicated to employees, lacks legal force and cannot serve as a basis for remuneration. Furthermore, the court ruled that a verbal dismissal altering wage conditions is ineffective unless the compensation regulation itself is formally changed first. Consequently, the employees' claims for commissions established in the invalid regulation were rejected, and the firm was ordered to pay the plaintiffs' legal costs.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 772 § 6 k.p.; Art. 772 § 5 k.p.: A compensation regulation must be written and communicated to employees to take effect; a dismissal altering such conditions is ineffective without a prior formal change to the regulation.