Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II PZP 8/04 AI generated

Employee cannot partially revoke employment agreement termination based on error regarding compensation amount.

Case Number II PZP 8/04
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the legal question regarding whether an employee could partially revoke a termination agreement based on error. The court found that while the agreement was valid, the employee could not selectively withdraw from the compensation clause. The decision established that partial revocation is only possible if the invalid part does not constitute the essential substance of the legal act.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 88 § 1 k.c.; Art. 300 k.p.; Art. 58 § 3 k.c.: A legal act containing an invalid part remains valid regarding the remaining parts only if the invalid part does not constitute the essential substance of the act.

Keywords

AI generated
partial revocation of legal act error in compensation amount essentialia negotii termination of employment agreement statutory invalidity substance of legal act employee compensation dispute

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 88 § 1 k.c.
Art. 300 k.p.
Art. 58 § 3 k.c.
art. 88 § 1 k.c
art. 300 k.p
art. 390 § 1 k.p.c
art. 84 § 2 k.c
art. 88 k.c
art. 58 k.c
art. 82 k.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated
I ACa 1105/98
V CK 477/02
III CRN 119/74

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text