Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I PK 494/03 AI generated

Supreme Court quashes labor law ruling where unilateral bank regulation change lacked proper notice. The court held that unilateral changes to compensation rules require notice. The court ruled that unilateral changes to compensation rules require notice.

Case Number I PK 494/03
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court quashed the lower court's dismissal of a labor dispute regarding compensation for job termination. The plaintiff argued that a new regulation reducing his severance pay required a formal notice of change under labor law. The court determined that the regulation constituted a unilateral decision altering employment terms, which legally necessitated a notice of change.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 17 ust. 4 pkt 10 ustawy o NBP; art. 42 k.p.: A unilateral management decision altering compensation rules constitutes a change in employment terms requiring a formal notice of change.

Keywords

AI generated
unilateral management decision notice of change employment terms modification severance pay regulation labor law procedure

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 17 ust. 4 pkt 10 ustawy z dnia 29 sierpnia 1997 r. o Narodowym Banku Polskim
art. 42 k.p.
art. 393 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 42 k.p
art. 328 § 2 k.p.c
art. 9 § 1 k.p
art. 42 § 1 k.p
art. 300 k.p
art. 61 k.c
art. 393 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text