Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II UZP 7/04 AI generated

Social security fund transfer claim dismissed as non-social security matter, allowing civil court route if properly framed.

Case Number II UZP 7/04
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the procedural objection regarding the admissibility of a civil lawsuit against a social security fund. The insured argued that the fund failed to transfer pension contributions to an open pension fund, but the lower court rejected the appeal because no formal decision was issued. The Supreme Court ruled that while the specific issue of contribution transfer does not fall under social security law, it can still be adjudicated in a standard civil proceeding if the plaintiff frames the claim correctly.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 476 § 2, 3 k.p.c.; Art. 83 ust. 1 ustawy o systemie ubezpieczeń społecznych: Although matters concerning the transfer of social security contributions to an open pension fund are not strictly social security disputes, they may be brought before a civil court if the claim is formulated as a civil action rather than a social security appeal.

Keywords

AI generated
social security contributions open pension fund civil procedure admissibility social security law scope administrative decision requirement

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 476 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 476 § 3 k.p.c.
Art. 199 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.
Art. 4779 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 83 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 13 października 1998 r. o systemie ubezpieczeń społecznych
art. 4779 § 1 k.p.c
art. 476 § 2 k.p.c
art. 476 § 3 k.p.c
art. 476 § 5 pkt 2 k.p.c
art. 390 § 1 k.p.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text