III SK 41/04
AI generated
Supreme Court dismissed appeal against antitrust decision regarding foreign investor protection under bilateral treaty.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the appeal by a telecommunications company against the Competition and Consumer Protection Office's antitrust decision. The court found that the foreign investors failed to establish they had made qualifying investments in Poland as required by the bilateral treaty. Consequently, the treaty's reciprocity clause did not apply to grant them protection against the alleged monopoly practices.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 1 pkt a (v) bilateral investment treaty; Art. 2 bilateral investment treaty: Protection under the treaty is reciprocal and applies only to investments made in the territory of the contracting state in accordance with its laws; foreign entities without such local investment cannot claim treaty-based antitrust protection.
Keywords
AI generated
bilateral investment treaty
reciprocity clause
monopoly protection
foreign investment
antitrust decision
local investment requirement
treaty application
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 84 ust. 1 pkt 1 ustawy z dnia 15 grudnia 2000 r. o ochronie konkurencji i konsumentów
Art. 4 pkt 1 ustawy z dnia 19 listopada 1999 r. Prawo działalności gospodarczej
Art. 1 pkt a (v) bilateral investment treaty
Art. 2 bilateral investment treaty
art. 77 § 1 k.p
art. 328 § 2 k.p.c
art. 2 Konstytucji RP