Supreme Court allows appeal, ruling social fund decisions on extra fees require substantive and purposeful judicial review.

The Supreme Court dismissed the social insurance fund's appeal against a lower court decision that exempted a company from an additional fee. The fund argued the decision was merely a formal check on payment status, but the court held that Article 24 of the Social Insurance Act mandates a review of the fee's substantive validity and purpose. Consequently, the court ruled that imposing such fees on insolvent entities lacks public interest and violates the principle of proportionality.