Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II UK 385/03 AI generated

Social Security Court dismisses appeal; recipient of pension via fraud must repay regardless of employer's role.

Case Number II UK 385/03
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the applicant's cassation appeal regarding the return of an improperly paid early pension. The applicant, who had been employed until late 1995, received a pension starting January 1996 after a formal dismissal that the court found to be a sham designed to facilitate early retirement. The court ruled that the applicant, having knowingly obtained the benefit through false documents or conscious deception, bears the primary obligation to repay the funds. Consequently, the applicant cannot use the employer's alleged role in the payment process as a defense against the statutory duty to return the nontitled benefit.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 138 ust. 1 ustawy o emeryturach i rentach z Funduszu Ubezpieczeń Społecznych; Art. 84 ust. 6 ustawy systemowej: The recipient of a pension obtained through false documents or conscious deception of the social security authority is personally obligated to return the benefit and cannot rely on the employer's involvement as a defense.

Keywords

AI generated
social security fraud pension return obligation false documents conscious deception employer liability early retirement fraud supreme court cassation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 138 ust. 1 of the Act on Pensions and Allowances from the Social Insurance Fund
Art. 84 ust. 6 of the System Act
art. 2 k.c
art. 378 k.p.c
art. 387 § 1 k.p.c
art. 391 § 1 k.p.c
art. 328 § 2 k.p.c
art. 39312 k.p.c

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text