Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
II UZP 4/04 AI generated

Supreme Court ruled that social security laws mandate civil law interest rates for delayed military pension payments before 2003.

Case Number II UZP 4/04
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court resolved a legal question regarding the basis for paying interest on delayed military pension payments prior to October 1, 2003. The court determined that Article 85 of the Social Security System Act, in conjunction with Article 11 of the Military Pension Act, provided the legal foundation for such interest. Consequently, the court established that military pension offices must pay interest calculated according to civil law standards, limited only by specific social security regulations.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 85 ust. 1 ustawy o systemie ubezpieczeń społecznych; Art. 11 ustawy o zaopatrzeniu emerytalnym żołnierzy zawodowych: The legal basis for paying interest on delayed military pension payments prior to October 1, 2003, is found in the Social Security System Act in conjunction with the Military Pension Act, requiring payment of civil law interest rates.

Keywords

AI generated
military pension interest social security law delayed payment liability civil law interest rates equal treatment principle legislative interpretation pension arrears

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 85 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 13 października 1998 r. o systemie ubezpieczeń społecznych
Art. 11 ustawy z dnia 10 grudnia 1993 r. o zaopatrzeniu emerytalnym żołnierzy zawodowych oraz ich rodzin
Art. 2 i 32 Konstytucji Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej
Art. 11 i art. 43 ust. 3 ustawy o zaopatrzeniu emerytalnym żołnierzy zawodowych
Art. 2a i art. 122 ust. 3 pkt 1 ustawy o systemie ubezpieczeń społecznych

Cited Case Law

AI generated
K 4/99
Constitutional Court clarifies that pension reform for uniformed personnel violates trust in law, not the act itself.
postanowienie z dnia 21 marca 2000 r. Trybunału Konstytucyjnego

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text