Social security appeal allowed; right to different pension type overrides value threshold for cassation.

The Supreme Court allowed the appellant's cassation appeal against a lower court decision denying a specific pension type. The appellant argued that the appeal concerned the right to a different pension under Article 27, not merely the amount of the pension granted under Article 28. The court ruled that because the dispute involved establishing a distinct legal right to a different benefit, the standard monetary value threshold for cassation did not apply. Consequently, the appeal was deemed admissible and the lower court's decision was set aside.