Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II UK 367/03 AI generated

Supreme Court allows civilian fire service substitute military service to count as police pension service.

Case Number II UK 367/03
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Poland quashed the appellate court's dismissal of Bogdan L.'s pension claim regarding his substitute military service. The applicant argued that his time serving as a designated firefighter in civil defense units should count toward police pension eligibility, while the lower courts rejected this based on a distinction between military and civil defense service. The court ruled that because the applicant performed actual service in a professional fire brigade unit, this period must be treated equivalently to military service for pension calculation purposes.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 13 ust. 1 pkt 2 ustawy o zaopatrzeniu emerytalnym funkcjonariuszy Policji; Art. 55 ust. 2 ustawy o powszechnym obowiązku obrony Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej: Substitute military service performed by a designated firefighter in a professional fire brigade unit is treated as military service for pension purposes.

Keywords

AI generated
substitute military service firefighter pension civil defense units police pension eligibility military service equivalence

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 13 ust. 1 pkt 2 ustawy z dnia 18 lutego 1994 r. o zaopatrzeniu emerytalnym funkcjonariuszy Policji...
Art. 55 ust. 2 ustawy z dnia 21 listopada 1967 r. o powszechnym obowiązku obrony Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej
Art. 129 ustawy z dnia 24 sierpnia 1991 r. o Państwowej Straży Pożarnej
Decret z dnia 27 grudnia 1974 r. o służbie funkcjonariuszy pożarnictwa
art. 39313 § 1 k.p.c

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text