Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
II UK 297/03 AI generated

Supreme Court dismissed cassation; continuous care excludes concurrent employment for early pension eligibility.

Case Number II UK 297/03
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by a father seeking an early pension for caring for his disabled daughter. The lower court found that the applicant failed to meet statutory requirements, specifically lacking the necessary health-related inability to continue full-time employment due to the child's condition. The court ruled that while family assistance is morally permissible and does not negate the caregiver's duty, the legal definition of 'continuous care' strictly requires uninterrupted, full-time dedication that precludes concurrent employment.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Dz.U. Nr 28, poz. 149; ustawa z dnia 17 grudnia 1998 r. o emeryturach i rentach z Funduszu Ubezpieczeń Społecznych: The right to an early pension for continuous care of a child requiring constant supervision is established by the continuous, daily, and uninterrupted nature of the care, which inherently excludes the possibility of concurrent employment, regardless of sporadic family assistance.

Keywords

AI generated
continuous care requirement early pension eligibility concurrent employment exclusion social insurance statute family assistance allowance caregiver duty definition pension entitlement conditions

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Dz.U. Nr 28, poz. 149
ustawa z dnia 17 grudnia 1998 r. o emeryturach i rentach z Funduszu Ubezpieczeń Społecznych
art. 3931 pkt 2 k.p.c
art. 39311 § 2 k.p.c

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text