Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III SK 30/04 AI generated

Supreme Court allows fine for applying unapproved tariffs, ruling submission alone does not satisfy approval requirement.

Case Number III SK 30/04
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court upheld a monetary fine against P.E.P. SA for applying energy tariffs without regulatory approval. The company argued the fine should be based on specific tariff types and that submitting a request fulfilled the legal obligation. The court rejected this, establishing that the law requires the full regulatory process including approval, publication, and a waiting period before tariffs can legally apply.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 56 ust. 1 pkt 5 ustawy Prawo energetyczne; Art. 47 ust. 1-3 Prawo energetyczne: The obligation to submit tariffs for approval is not fulfilled merely by submission; compliance requires obtaining approval, publication, and the lapse of the statutory waiting period before application.

Keywords

AI generated
energy tariffs regulatory approval monetary fine unapproved pricing energy law compliance

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 56 ust. 1 pkt 5 ustawy Prawo energetyczne
Art. 47 ust. 1-3 ustawy Prawo energetyczne
Art. 393 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 39311 k.p.c
art. 39313 k.p.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated
XVII Ame 71/02

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text