Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III SK 27/04 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal; Energy Law excludes Competition Law from approved heat tariffs.

Case Number III SK 27/04
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by a housing cooperative against the President of the Competition and Consumer Protection Office. The court held that the Energy Law explicitly excludes the application of the Competition and Consumer Protection Act to approved heat tariffs. Consequently, the lower court could not question the fee levels resulting from the final regulatory decision. The court reasoned that the Energy Law's specific provisions override the general competition rules in this context.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 47 ust. 1 Prawo energetyczne; Art. 93 ust. 1 ustawy o ochronie konkurencji i konsumentów: The Energy Law excludes the application of the Competition and Consumer Protection Act to approved heat tariffs, preventing competition authorities from challenging fee levels derived from final regulatory decisions.

Keywords

AI generated
Energy Law exclusion Heat tariff approval Competition authority Regulatory decision Supreme Court cassation Dominant position abuse Statutory hierarchy

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 47 ust. 1 of the Energy Law
Art. 93 of the Competition and Consumer Protection Act
Art. 393 of the Code of Civil Procedure
Art. 98 of the Code of Civil Procedure
art. 233 § 1 k.p.c
art. 328 § 2 k.p.c
art. 384¹ k.c
art. 384 k.c
art. 3531 k.c
art. 3841 k.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated
Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie-Sąd Antymonopolowy, XVII Ama 96/01
Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie-Sąd Antymonopolowy, XVII Ama 88/01
Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie-Sąd Antymonopolowy, XVII Ama 57/01
Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie-Sąd Antymonopolowy, XVII Ama 51/01
Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie-Sąd Antymonopolowy, XVII Ama 30/01
Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie-Sąd Antymonopolowy, XVII Ama 101/00
III CRN 120/91
III CZP 57/98

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text