Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
SNO 10/04 AI generated

Supreme Court remands disciplinary case to Appeal Court for proper assignment of disciplinary court under Art. 43 K.P.K.

Case Number SNO 10/04
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the request to determine the disciplinary court, ordering the case remanded to the Appeal Court. The disciplinary proceedings involved a judge whose case required proper assignment under Article 43 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The court ruled that the initial procedural step was flawed, necessitating a transfer to the correct appellate body for adjudication.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 43 k.p.k.; Art. 44 k.p.k.: When a disciplinary case requires the determination of the competent court, the Supreme Court must remand the matter to the appropriate appellate court if the initial assignment was procedurally incorrect.

Keywords

AI generated
disciplinary proceedings court assignment Code of Criminal Procedure remand procedure judicial discipline Supreme Court procedural error

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 43 k.p.k.
Art. 44 k.p.k.
art. 43 k.p.k

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

POSTANOWIENIE Z DNIA 18 MARCA 2004 R. SNO 10/04 Przewodniczący: sędzia SN Edward Matwijów. Sędziowie SN: Gerard Bieniek (sprawozdawca), Barbara Wagner. Sąd Najwyższy – Sąd Dyscyplinarny w sprawie sędziego Sądu Rejonowego na posiedzeniu niejawnym w dniu 18 marca 2004 r., o wyznaczenie sądu dyscyplinarnego w trybie art. 43 k.p.k., postanowił: p r z e k a z a ć s p r a w ę sędziego Sądu Rejonowego do rozpoznania Sądowi Apelacyjnemu – Sądowi Dyscyplinarnemu.