Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III PZP 19/03 AI generated

Supreme Court ruled judicial clerks' 2002 salary governed the 1999 regulation, not the 2001 Act's general provision.

Case Number III PZP 19/03
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the claim by judicial clerks seeking salary equalization for 2002 based on a more favorable 2001 Act provision. The clerks argued that the new law should apply retroactively to benefit them, while the lower court rejected this by noting the specific 2002 salary rules. The court held that the 2001 Act temporarily suspended the old regulation for that year, meaning the 1999 regulation remained the valid basis for their pay.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 2a rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 17 marca 1999 r.; art. 205 ustawy z dnia 27 lipca 2001 r. - A specific transitional provision temporarily suspends the application of a general provision, meaning the old regulation remains valid for the specified period.

Keywords

AI generated
judicial clerks salary transitional provisions temporal suspension retroactive application specific vs general law

Cited Legislation

AI generated
§ 2a rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 17 marca 1999 r.
art. 151 § 1 ustawy z dnia 27 lipca 2001 r.
art. 205 ustawy z dnia 27 lipca 2001 r.

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text