Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I PK 254/03 AI generated

Polish Supreme Court dismissed appeal, ruling that a two-year staff council term extends until direct privatization decree issuance.

Case Number I PK 254/03
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Polish Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by Barbara S. against her dismissal from a state-owned publishing house. The court found that the staff council's two-year term was legally extended until the issuance of the direct privatization decree, meaning the council's consent to her dismissal remained valid. Consequently, the court held that the employer did not violate procedural protections because the council's authority persisted beyond the initial two-year period.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 6 ust. 1 ustawy o samorządzie załogi przedsiębiorstwa państwowego; Art. 13 ust. 3 i Art. 15 ust. 3 ustawy o komercjalizacji i prywatyzacji: The two-year term of a staff council in a state-owned enterprise is extended until the issuance of a direct privatization decree, thereby preserving the council's authority to consent to employee dismissal during that period.

Keywords

AI generated
staff council term extension direct privatization decree state-owned enterprise dismissal labor law cassation employee consent validity Polish labor code privatization procedure

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 6 ust. 1 ustawy o samorządzie załogi przedsiębiorstwa państwowego
Art. 13 ust. 3 ustawy o komercjalizacji i prywatyzacji
Art. 15 ust. 3 ustawy o komercjalizacji i prywatyzacji
Art. 41 ust. 1 ustawy o komercjalizacji i prywatyzacji
Art. 393 § 12 k.p.c.
Art. 98 k.p.c.
art. 233 § 1 k.p.c
art. 328 § 2 k.p.c
art. 30 § 4 k.p
art. 45 § 1 k.p

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text