I PK 282/03
AI generated
Supreme Court rules dismissal allowed when new pay rules apply after effective notice date of dismissal.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court partially dismissed the plaintiff's cassation appeal regarding unpaid severance and salary for the notice period. The court found that while the dismissal was effective upon delivery of the notice, the new pay regulation applied after that date. Consequently, the employee is entitled only to the pre-dismissal salary rate for the notice period, not the higher post-dismissal rate.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 70 § 2 k.p.; Art. 61 k.c. w związku z art. 70 § 1 i § 11 k.p. oraz w związku z art. 300 k.p.: A dismissal from a position becomes effective only upon delivery allowing the employee to review the notice, and a change in pay regulations occurring after this effective date does not entitle the employee to a higher salary for the notice period.
Keywords
AI generated
dismissal from position
notice period salary
pay regulation change
effective date of notice
labor law interpretation
Cited Legislation
AI generatedart. 70 § 2 zdanie drugie k.p.
art. 61 k.c. w związku z art. 70 § 1 i § 11 k.p. oraz w związku z art. 300 k.p.
art. 39313 k.p.c.
art. 108 § 2 k.p.c. w związku z art. 39319 k.p.c.
art. 70 k.p
art. 61 k.c
art. 300 k.p
art. 70 § 2 k.p
art. 772 § 5 k.p
art. 24113 § 1 k.p
Cited Case Law
AI generateduchwała Sądu Najwyższego z 8 listopada 1988 r., III PZP 34/88
uchwała siedmiu sędziów Sądu Najwyższego z 16 maja 1991, I PZP 3/91
wyrok Sądu Apelacyjnego w 6 Katowicach z 7 października 1992 r., III APr 54/92