I PK 157/03
AI generated
Supreme Court dismisses appeal; civil servants appointed under 1982 Act are not covered by 1998 Act or Civil Service Act.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court quashed the lower court's judgment and remanded the case for a new decision on costs. The plaintiff, a civil servant appointed under the 1982 State Office Employees Act, sued for reinstatement after being fired for perjury. The court ruled that the 1998 Civil Service Act and Article 52 of the Labor Code do not apply to employees appointed under the 1982 Act, which governs their termination rules exclusively.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 60 pkt 4 ustawy o służbie cywilnej; art. 52 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.; Art. 4 pkt 3 ustawy o służbie cywilnej; Employees appointed under the 1982 Act on State Office Employees are not civil servants under the 1998 Act and are governed solely by the 1982 Act regarding termination.
Keywords
AI generated
civil servants
state office employees
termination of employment
perjury conviction
labor code application
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 60 pkt 4 of the Civil Service Act of 18 December 1998
Art. 52 § 1 pkt 2 of the Labor Code
Art. 4 pkt 3 of the Civil Service Act of 18 December 1998
Art. 138 ust. 1 of the Civil Service Act of 18 December 1998
Art. 14 ust. 1 of the Act on Employees of State Offices of 16 September 1982
art. 52 § 1 pkt 2 k.p
art. 234 k.k
art. 12 k.k
art. 234 § 1 k.k
art. 56 § 2 k.p
Cited Case Law
AI generatedII SA 451/84