I PK 103/03
AI generated
Supreme Court dismisses appeal, ruling school is employer, not city mayor or office, for dismissal case.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, sending the case back to the regional court for a new ruling on costs. The plaintiff sought damages from the city mayor and municipal office for his dismissal as a school principal, arguing the mayor was the employer. The court clarified that while the mayor is the superior officer, the school itself is the legal employer, making the city and mayor improper defendants in a labor dispute.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 38 pkt 2 ustawy o systemie oświaty; Art. 33 ust. 5 ustawy o samorządzie gminnym: The school is the employer of the principal, not the municipal office or mayor, who acts only as a superior officer.
Keywords
AI generated
school principal dismissal
labor law employer
municipal authority liability
civil compensation claim
procedural standing
public school administration
supreme court appeal
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 38 pkt 2 ustawy z dnia 7 września 1991 r. o systemie oświaty
Art. 77 ust. 1 Konstytucji RP
Art. 33 ust. 5 ustawy o samorządzie gminnym
Art. 11a ustawy o samorządzie gminnym
Art. 2 ust. 2 ustawy o samorządzie gminnym
Art. 393 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 77 ust. 1 Konstytucji
art. 52 k.p
art. 68 § 1 k.p
art. 70 § 1 k.p