Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I PK 625/02 AI generated

Labor law ruling: immediate termination for prior crimes does not require prior criminal proceedings.

Case Number I PK 625/02
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by former employees seeking reinstatement. The court found that the employer's immediate termination for prior crimes was lawful because the employer discovered the misconduct while managing a subsequent employment contract. The decision clarified that procedural delays in criminal prosecution do not invalidate the employer's right to terminate for obvious crimes discovered during a new employment relationship.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 52 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.; Art. 393 § 1 k.p.c.: The immediate termination of an employment contract for the commission of an obvious crime does not require the initiation of criminal proceedings, and such termination may concern conduct from a prior employment relationship discovered during the execution of a subsequent contract.

Keywords

AI generated
immediate termination prior employment conduct obvious crime criminal proceedings requirement labor law termination subsequent employment contract reinstatement appeal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 52 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.
Art. 393 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 8 k.p.
Art. 30 § 4 k.p.
art. 52 § 1 pkt 2 k.p
art. 57 § 1 k.p
art. 382 k.p.c
art. 233 § 1 k.p.c
art. 52 k.p
art. 303 k.p.k

Cited Case Law

AI generated
I PKN 361/99
Supreme Court dismisses appeal in labor dispute, ruling civil evidence rules do not apply criminal 'benefit of doubt' principle.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text