Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III RN 133/02 AI generated

Supreme Court dismissed tax appeal, ruling that tax law definitions must align with building law, not popular usage.

Case Number III RN 133/02
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the taxpayers' appeal against the tax office's decision to deny a housing construction tax relief. The taxpayers argued they met the statutory conditions for the relief by building and occupying a multi-unit dwelling, despite the building permit being issued to a housing cooperative. The court held that the term 'multi-unit residential building' in the tax code must be interpreted according to the Building Law, rejecting the taxpayers' reliance on a popular understanding of the word 'multi'. Consequently, the court found the tax office's application of the law correct and upheld the denial of the tax benefit.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 26 ust. 1 pkt 6 ustawy o podatku dochodowym od osób fizycznych; Art. 26 ust. 1 pkt 6 ustawy o podatku dochodowym od osób fizycznych: The term 'multi-unit residential building' in tax law must be interpreted according to the Building Law, not based on popular usage or teleological considerations.

Keywords

AI generated
tax relief denial multi-unit building definition tax code interpretation Building Law alignment popular usage rejection tax authority decision legal term definition

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 207 § 1 Ordynacji podatkowej
art. 21 § 3 Ordynacji podatkowej
art. 53 § 4 Ordynacji podatkowej
art. 45 ust. 6 ustawy o podatku dochodowym od osób fizycznych
art. 26 ust. 1 pkt 6 ustawy o podatku dochodowym od osób fizycznych
art. 233 § 1 pkt 2 lit. a Ordynacji podatkowej

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text