Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II UK 144/03 AI generated

Work performed under a void employment contract to bypass pension rules counts as farmer cooperative membership period, not employee insurance period.

Case Number II UK 144/03
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal against a social insurance office decision regarding early pension eligibility. The court found that while the employment contract was void due to an attempt to circumvent pension laws, the work performed remained a contribution period for the farmer cooperative. Consequently, the insured was entitled to the cooperative's pension scheme rather than the employee scheme.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 58 § 1 k.c.; Art. 300 k.p.; Art. 29 ust. 1 ustawy o emeryturach i rentach; Art. 6 pkt 3 ustawy z dnia 13 października 1998 r. o systemie ubezpieczeń społecznych: Work performed under a void employment contract concluded to bypass pension regulations constitutes a contribution period for the farmer cooperative, not for the employee social insurance scheme.

Keywords

AI generated
void employment contract social insurance contributions farmer cooperative membership early pension eligibility circumvention of law contribution period classification art 58 k.c.

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 58 § 1 k.c.
Art. 300 k.p.
Art. 29 ust. 1 ustawy o emeryturach i rentach
Art. 6 pkt 3 ustawy z dnia 13 października 1998 r. o systemie ubezpieczeń społecznych
Art. 27 ustawy o emeryturach i rentach
art. 83 § 1 k.c
art. 382 k.p.c
art. 233 § 1 k.p.c
art. 366 k.p.c
art. 232 k.p.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text