Supreme Court dismissed cassation regarding social insurance contributions for prisoners, rejecting tax income definitions.

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by a clothing manufacturer against a social insurance fund decision. The manufacturer argued that the lower courts incorrectly applied regulations defining 'total income' for prisoners, claiming a legal error under Article 3931(1) of the Civil Procedure Code. The court rejected this, ruling that the specific regulation governing social insurance contributions for prisoners does not incorporate tax income concepts and that the legal issue was irrelevant to the pre-1999 statutory framework.