I PK 512/02
AI generated
Supreme Court dismissed cassation; employee's refusal of higher pay without consent prevents employer's unilateral change.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by an employee against a lower court's rejection of his wage equalization claim. The employee had refused to accept a board resolution offering a higher salary, citing concerns about his pension, while the employer attempted to unilaterally implement the change. The court ruled that such a unilateral modification requires the employee's explicit or implied consent, which was absent in this case.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 42 § 1-3 k.p.; Art. 84 k.p.; A unilateral change of remuneration conditions by an employer requires the employee's explicit or implied consent, and a refusal to accept a higher wage does not constitute a waiver of statutory rights.
Keywords
AI generated
unilateral wage change
employee consent requirement
remuneration modification
labor law dispute
implied acceptance
cassation dismissal
salary equalization
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 42 § 1-3 k.p.
Art. 84 k.p.
Art. 393 § 12 k.p.c.
art. 42 k.p
art. 385 k.p.c
art. 6 k.c
art. 84 k.p
art. 9 § 1 k.p
art. 29 § 3 k.p
art. 60 k.c