Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II UK 101/03 AI generated

Supreme Court allows appeal regarding work accident protocol interest when Social Insurance Fund pays benefits.

Case Number II UK 101/03
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Poland quashed the lower court's dismissal of the plaintiff's claim due to a lack of legal interest. The court found that while the Social Insurance Fund, not the employer, was obligated to pay benefits, the plaintiff still had a legal interest in establishing the work accident protocol. Consequently, the case was remanded for a new trial to properly address the procedural requirements for obtaining such a protocol.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 36 ust. 1 ustawy o świadczeniach z tytułu wypadków przy pracy i chorób zawodowych; Art. 393 § 1 k.p.c.: The existence of a legal interest for an employee to obtain a work accident protocol persists even when the Social Insurance Fund, rather than the employer, is the entity obligated to pay the corresponding benefits.

Keywords

AI generated
legal interest in work accident Social Insurance Fund obligation work accident protocol remittal for retrial employee rights protection

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 36 ust. 1 ustawy o świadczeniach z tytułu wypadków przy pracy i chorób zawodowych
Art. 393 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 366 k.p.c.
§ 2 ust. 3 rozporządzenia Ministra Pracy, Płac i Spraw Socjalnych oraz Ministra Zdrowia i Opieki Społecznej z dnia 17 października 1975 r.
art. 189 k.p.c
art. 242 k.p
art. 386 § 1 k.p.c
art. 32 Konstytucji
art. 316 § 1 k.p.c
art. 234 § 1 k.p

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text