III AO 8/03
AI generated
Supreme Court dismisses jurisdiction designation request as collective agreement clause lacks domestic jurisdiction basis.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court rejected the plaintiff's request to designate a Polish court for a supplementary work injury claim against a Norwegian company. While the plaintiff argued that a collective agreement and civil code provisions granted jurisdiction to Gdyni or Gdańsk courts, the court found no basis for such jurisdiction. The court determined that the collective agreement clause only addressed payment deductions and did not establish a forum selection agreement for the underlying dispute.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 45 k.p.c.; Art. 1099 k.p.c.; Art. 1104 k.p.c.: A clause in a collective agreement regarding payment deductions does not constitute a valid agreement on jurisdiction for the underlying substantive dispute.
Keywords
AI generated
jurisdiction designation
collective agreement clause
forum selection agreement
work injury claim
domestic jurisdiction
Norwegian company
Supreme Court decision
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 45 k.p.c.
Art. 1099 k.p.c.
Art. 1104 k.p.c.
Art. 443 k.c.
Art. 447 k.c.
art. 45 k.p.c
art. 1099 k.p.c
art. 1104 k.p.c