I PK 324/02
AI generated
Written consent for non-cash wages is mandatory; oral agreement clauses are void under Polish Labor Code.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court partially allowed the plaintiff's cassation appeal, overturning the appellate court's dismissal of the wage claim. The plaintiff argued that the employer's reliance on an oral employee consent for non-cash wage payments violated the strict requirement for written consent under the Labor Code. The court ruled that the statutory mandate for written consent is absolutely binding, rendering any internal regulation permitting oral consent void and ineffective.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 86 § 3 k.p.; Art. 9 § 2 k.p.: The requirement for written employee consent for non-cash wage payment is strictly mandatory; any provision in a work regulation allowing oral consent is void.
Keywords
AI generated
written consent requirement
non-cash wage payment
void work regulation clause
Labor Code provisions
employee consent validity
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 86 § 3 k.p.
Art. 9 § 2 k.p.
Art. 393 § 15 k.p.c.
Art. 393 § 12 k.p.c.
Art. 100 k.p.c.
art. 86 § 3 k.p
art. 9 § 2 k.p
art. 71 k.p
art. 61 k.c
art. 81 § 1 k.p