Supreme Court quashes dismissal of council member's job offer due to lack of regional council consent.

The Supreme Court quashed the lower court's dismissal of the plaintiff's claim to return to his position as a regional council member. The plaintiff argued that his employer violated the law by terminating his employment without the required consent from the regional council, while the employer contended that the termination was justified by the plaintiff's refusal of a new role. The court ruled that while the dismissal was legally flawed, the plaintiff's claim to immediate reinstatement must be evaluated against social coexistence principles and economic realities, which were not sufficiently examined by the lower court.