I PK 328/02
AI generated
Supreme Court dismissed appeal, ruling lawyer's private practice constitutes business activity excluding severance pay.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's cassation appeal against a lower court ruling denying her severance pay. The court found that the plaintiff, while employed, simultaneously operated a sole practitioner law firm, engaging in legal services for profit. Consequently, the court held that this concurrent activity constituted a business operation, legally excluding her from the statutory right to severance compensation under the relevant group dismissal act.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 8 ust. 3 pkt 5 ustawy o zwolnieniach grupowych; Art. 431 k.c.: The performance of legal services by a lawyer in a sole practice constitutes a business activity for profit, thereby excluding the employee from the right to severance pay under group dismissal regulations.
Keywords
AI generated
severance pay exclusion
lawyer sole practice
business activity definition
group dismissal act
concurrent employment
Cited Legislation
AI generatedart. 8 ust. 3 pkt 5 ustawy z dnia 28 grudnia 1989 r. o szczególnych zasadach rozwiązywania z pracownikami stosunków pracy z przyczyn dotyczących zakładu pracy
art. 87 ust. 1 Prawa działalności gospodarczej
art. 431 k.c.
art. 89 § 3 k.p.c
art. 87 k.s.h
art. 431 k.c
art. 39312 k.p.c