III RN 36/03
AI generated
Supreme Court dismissed extraordinary review as constitutional questions did not affect the case outcome.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the extraordinary review filed by the General Prosecutor against a decision regarding the restitution of assets. The applicant argued that the Social Commission's rules violated the Constitution, but the Court found these provisions unrelated to the specific grounds for the review. Consequently, the Court ruled that a constitutional question could not be raised because the answer did not influence the final judgment.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 193 Konstytucji RP; Art. 79 ust. 1 Konstytucji RP: A constitutional question may be raised by a court only if the answer is necessary for the resolution of the case, otherwise the party must file a separate constitutional complaint.
Keywords
AI generated
extraordinary review
constitutional question
restitution of assets
Social Commission
Constitutional Court
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 193 Konstytucji RP
Art. 79 ust. 1 Konstytucji RP
Art. 190 ust. 4 Konstytucji RP
Art. 393 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 2 ust. 2, ust. 2a i ust. 3a ustawy o zwrocie majątku
art. 7 k.p
art. 33 k.c
art. 78 Konstytucji
art. 193 Konstytucji RP
art. 79 ust. 1 Konstytucji RP
Cited Case Law
AI generatedIII CKN 326/01
II CRN 6/96